Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image

Mace & Crown | April 30, 2017

Scroll to top

Top

One Comment

Is Marijuana Decriminalization Coming to Norfolk?

Is Marijuana Decriminalization Coming to Norfolk?

T.J. Thompson
Contributing Writer

In preparation for the Virginia Municipal League (VML) Conference, which occurs from Oct. 9-11, Norfolk City Council addressed issues they would like to place in their legislative package to be sent to Richmond. This package includes the issues they wish legislators in the General Assembly would consider during their session. According to their website, the VML is a body consisting of civic leaders from 38 cities, 160 counties and eight towns across Virginia. A topic brought up for consideration in the Aug. 23 meeting of Norfolk City Council was the decriminalization of small amounts of marijuana.

Councilman Paul Riddick brought up this topic to be considered for the Norfolk legislative package because he believes it’s time the Virginia General Assembly addresses policies which have been in place since the ’70s.

According to a 2015 study conducted at Shenandoah University by Dr. Jon Gettman, while the national average for simple marijuana possession arrests declined over an 11 year period by 6.5%, this rate increased in Virginia by 76%. What is more appalling is comparing arrest rates of African Americans to those of their white cohorts. Although use by African-Americans in Virginia is slightly higher than Caucasians (11.3% to 9.1% respectively), arrest rates in 2013 were 233% greater for blacks when compared with whites regarding simple marijuana possession. In Norfolk alone, an African-American is five times more likely to be arrested for this minor infraction.

Councilman Riddick believes decriminalizing possession of small amounts of marijuana could free up city resources as well as pave the way for Virginia to catch up with the 21 other states which have either decriminalized marijuana, or are waiting for decriminalization to take affect. This is currently a discussion and can only be considered by the Virginia General Assembly, at the earliest during their 2017 legislative session beginning in January. In Virginia, all legislative power rests within the hands of the General Assembly, and cities cannot implement their own laws overriding state laws. Where a difference could possibly be made is through the enforcement of those laws. City council could request the police cease arresting people for simple marijuana possession as well as stop the prosecution by the Commonwealth’s Attorney for these types of arrests. This would then place simple marijuana possession at the lowest possible level of enforcement by the city police, allowing them to focus on other issues that may affect society in a more negative way.

This topic is important to students because of the implications it can have upon their future. With even a low level drug offense, federal financial aid will be forfeited, possibly causing a student to be unable to afford a higher education. A conviction can also scar job applications as well as create a financial burden upon a young adult. Virginia statute also requires the forfeiture of your driver’s license (even if no vehicle was involved in the arrest) for a simple possession charge. These are burdens which further disenfranchise younger generations.

As Norfolk prepares their dialogue for the VML conference, one can only imagine how the reception of marijuana decriminalization will be received. With an overwhelming majority of support on the topic in Hampton Roads (77% according to a Wason Center Poll at Christopher Newport University in Jan. 2015), is it time for progress on this conversation?

  • Aris

    It isn’t about giving the people what they want. It’s about committing and having a strong moral conviction for what’s morally correct.

    I support Portugal to lead the next United Nations General Assembly Special Session on Drugs 2019. Portugal not only complied with “The Political Declaration and Plan Of Action on International Cooperation towards an Integrated and Balanced Strategy to Counter the World Drug Problem”, but they’ve far exceeded the U.N agreement to resolve the drug epidemic, in which the U.S fails at miserably.
    http://www.unodc.org/documents/ungass2016/V0984963-English.pdf
    Rodrigo Duterte’s preventing the Philippines from substantial economic growth by continuing a useless War on Drugs. America spends over $51 billion annually to fund the War on Drugs that does more harm than good. Portugal decriminalized drugs and has seen a plummet in drug abuse, a 66% drop in drug related court cases and a decline in HIV cases. Portugal has also reported a 20% increase in drug treatment. At 0.9% Portugal has the lowest drug use rate of any Western European country (6.1% UK, 4.6% Italy, and 3.2% Germany). 46.4% of America’s prison population are all drug offenses. That’s 85,419 inmates, according to statistics based on prior month’s data sheet – March 20, 2016. Drug abuse is a health issue, not a crime issue. The solution to drug abuse is proper medical drug treatments, not solitary confinement.
    Now compare the Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte and American President Nixon’s political approach on drug abuse to Portugal’s drug decriminalization policy. Do you honestly think Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte, America’s DEA law enforcement and anybody who support’s the War on Drugs knows anything about what they’re talking about when it comes to helping drug addicts? By the way, Rodrigo Duterte demonstrates no understanding in economics, and neither does Congressman Manny Pacquiao.
    The prohibition against hemp cannabis is completely inappropriate and unethically immoral. I’m agitated of the fact just knowing that these government officials indoctrinate citizens to accept the law as a fundamental fact, instead of granting them the encouragement to ask fundamental questions. According to Law Enforcements standard, as a member of society, you obey or face the consequences without question. The job and responsibility of active duty law enforcement is to guard liberty and protect life, yet through these inappropriate laws, they violate liberty and destroy lives. The law has been perverted in the hands of the governing elites. It is employed to do the very thing that the law is designed to prevent. The enforcer turns out to be the main violator of its own standards.
    “When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law.” — Bastiat, “The Law”